This essay intends to show you how to connect the dots, so you can predict the damage that may result from a hoax at hand. In fact, it allows you the choice of letting the hoax continue, or demand that it be stopped.
Responsibility for a hoax
Responsibility for damage inflicted on the environment by enterprising parties is generally not assumed by them. Instead, where possible, it is deferred to the population at large. So was 'global warming.'
The population at large was duly blamed for causing global warming. CO2 was the main reason, and 'carbon credits' were invented and levied in support of the accusation. It worked like a charm. Soon, 'global warming' had become a household term, intelligent sounding claptrap at dinner parties, and warmly embraced by the scientific community.
In fact, Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' had sparked a new fire in the world! People now had new ties that bind and rallied together worldwide to 'protest global warming.' Children were recruited to give the protests extra weight, and a labile young girl was presented as the poster-girl for 'global warming.' The new feel-good worked! The new scare kept the masses trembling in fear and occupied with phantom explanations.
But everyone failed to see that it was just another enormous hoax. And as hoaxes do, this one too was intended to shroud the ulterior motive and its real intent.
Too late
A hoax is perpetrated because public knowledge about it does not exist. While the hoax is ongoing, nobody is aware, and this is how it can be rolled out. By the time the hoax has been fully perpetrated, it is too late and the damage is done.
To figure out why a program was in fact a hoax, one has to look at the reason why the hoax was constructed. There are many examples of hoaxes in the recent past, and each one can be attributed to ulterior motives that were at stake. Not in the least of it, money or politics. And nowadays also egotistical pursuits of geoengineering that support the latest industry.
Another way of detecting a hoax, is by looking at current events and connecting the dots. By doing so, one can detect the hoax in advance, and prevent any damage that will ensue from it.
Deferring responsibility - an example
We need not go into much detail for the purpose of this essay, but one recent example of a hoax is the 'covid pandemic.' The same deferral of responsibility took place with the 'covid pandemic.' People at large were being blamed of spreading the covid disease: those people that declined the 'vaccination.' The inconvenient truth was that they 'infected' those who had accepted the mRNA injection. The source of infection was thus laid by non-vaccinated individuals, instead of by the real source - quite possibly a combination of technology and biology, but in any case a disease whose origin is a sore topic of dispute.
Again, we're not going into the nature of the 'covid virus' in this essay, but the 'pandemic' is a good example to show how other parties are injustly accused of wrong-doing in order to lay the responsibility of the damage with them, just like with the global warming that you are now being fined for with the carbon credits and crimping of your lifestyle in various ways.
Why is global warming a hoax?
The population at large has no doubt about it that global warming is real. It presents a very acceptable reality that they can deal with in their lives. It makes them feel good to save a few pennies on warming their homes. It makes them feel good to spend more money to prevent CO2 emissions from their car. And more. However, nobody ever asks the question how it is possible that 'global warming' suddenly comes into existence? The explanation that the 'earth is warming up' is so incredibly cockamamie, yet supported with plenty of scientific vernacular, that everybody has come to accept it as the truth.
In fact, the Earth is stable in volume and size - neither losing weight nor gaining weight. Stating that it is 'warming up' would suggest that the Earth will alter its properties. Of course, upon reading this essay, an entire gaggle of scientists may warn you that the Earth is quite capable of warming up, but they will fail to tell you that it will burst out of its seams and probably crack to bits. But then again, they may have the explanations for this too - for instance earthquakes, volcano’s erupting, floods etc, are all ‘caused by the Earth warming up’ and therefore expanding in size. Indeed, the Earth is bursting at the seams, and it is all due to ‘global warming.’ You can go back to grazing in your pasture again.
The Sun is shining harder!
That's another incredible explanation for global warming. A planet that has been in existence for millions of years, is suddenly starting to shine harder, in the last 15 years or so. And very conveniently, ever since Al Gore’s announcement of 'global warming.' Anybody with a good sense of time and processes that span eons, will agree that this is total cockamamie too.
Climate change, then, is not caused by the Sun shining harder, or by the Earth warming up. Instead it is caused by the use of electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) on the crust of the Earth and against the upper, protective layers that surround the Earth. The use of EMF causes anomalies in the weather patterns, including the global climate.
To admit this, is admitting to an environmental crime of such proportion that it may well cause the demise of humanity and any other life form as we know on earth.
This is why 'global warming' was called into existence, and became the hoax that you need to open your eyes to.
Sun is much more shrill nowadays
And that is because the protective layers around the Earth are systematically being removed. To be replaced by the chalk layer that Gates wants to implement with the help of Harvard. This is planned for Agenda2030. To be rolled out around 2030.
Why? In favor of space travel, which will benefit from a sky that does not include plasma layers that hinder departures into ‘space’.