This essay explains how government and/or military programs come into existence, and get implemented without you knowing it.
Introduction
Ex-Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison is a prime example of how parasitic underlings frame the plans for their parasitic masters. Whereas they masquerade as the duly elected shepherds of the population, they in fact operate as the appointed administrators and recorders for the decisionmakers behind closed doors.
Kay later was rewarded by Donald Trump (he himself another administrator for parasitic masters behind closed doors) for her loyal rubberstamping of various programs, by an appointment to the NATO. The NATO, the global horror thinktank, was of course the proper step up for Kay, who had delivered without a hitch on the global weather modification program. She had proven to be a real asset.
Formatting the program
The way these Senators frame a program is fairly simple. For instance, the program that was required to modify the weather, followed the same framing strategy. There is an 8 part article about the Weather Modification Act on this substack here:
If you take the time to identify the components of the November 2005 discussion, you will discover the format these parasitic administrators deploy to rubberstamp a program.
Format components
First, there has to be a reason for the program. This is so they can inform the public of its merit, should the public even come to know or want to know. In the case of the Weather Act the motivator was ‘droughts’ and a potential ‘shortage of water around 2020’ plus ‘increased demands.’ Well, it is past 2020 now, and there is only a shortage of water wherever the weather modifiers remove the rainfall. And there is a surplus of water wherever the weather modifiers see it fit to flood the area with water.
Then, of course, the presence of ‘experts’ is required. These are generally individuals with a PhD. Whether they have the know-it-all is not relevant. They have normally been tenured at some organization that deals with the subject matter discussed. The experts are very important, because they provide the shape for the rubberstamp. Make no mistake, a guy like Michael Garstang (see pic) does fun research, for instance this: “The Daily Cycle of Low-Frequency Elephant Calls and Near-Surface Atmospheric Conditions” and more elephant related research.
There must be various subcommittees present. In this case, one of them is the subcommittee on ‘Science and Space.’ Just the name alone should give you some inkling what this Weather Modification involves. Yes, it is ‘science’ but it is also SPACE! And notice that John D. Rockefeller the Fourth is on this panel.
Now you have two big clues into the program. The committees are keyplayers as the driving force.
For the purpose of the discussion they allow the experts some time to make an expert statement for the record. This statement is based on the expert’s prepared statement. It provides the overall shape of the rubberstamp.
The discussion makes use of a Question & Answer session for the record. This Q&A is of crucial importance, because it must produce the steelclad answers - just in case some concerned citizen may raise an issue. The lawyers play a big role in this, because they want to make sure the experts’ dialogue is legal-proof. If they are satifsfied with the answers, that means that the program is watertight and safe from litigation.
Then there is the vernacular they use in the discussion. These are words and terms that must be recorded for the program to successfully go live, as well as words and terms that are carefully avoided. Words that they avoid are ‘anthropogenic’ - which was scrapped from the original House Bill. It means ‘caused by human activity.’
Another term they omit is ‘electromagnetic frequency,’ in conjunction with HAARP. Lastly, the words for the title are carefully selected, but do not provide transparency:
What may this ‘and for other purposes’ have to do in the record? It is not surprising, and quite disturbing, that they opt to be vague about the title, instead of concise.
Program implementation
During the discussion various promises and agreements are recorded. For instance, the claim is made that there will be no operational cloud seeding taking place. But, as you know, cloud seeding is a common practise nowadays. Just look up at what is being sprayed to attract water, above your head. The general public is kept unaware for as long as possible; if need be with complete nonsense, like the Al Gore ‘inconvenient truth’ hullabaloo. Even today, people refuse to acknowledge the presence of white stripes in the sky.
But these stripes really do have a purpose. They attract water, or they disperse water. It rains, or it shines. Oftentimes, after copious spraying, the blue sky is covered with clouds the next day. All you have to do is look up every day to recognize the action-reaction pattern.
That’s how the Weather Modification Act was born. Thanks to the diligent administrative work by human parasite Kay Bailey Hutchison and her human parasite committees.
Did you have a say in this? No. You did not even know it was going on.
Conclusion
Where was your consent in the matter?